Since 1992, the United States government has sent close to $3 billion in aid to the nation of Haiti, and after the recent earthquake decimated an already decrepit economy, the international community has responded with an outpouring of support.
Benefit concerts have been held, community outreach programs initiated and school aid projects have been fervently supported by those wanting to help the citizens of Haiti.
But what many donors and supporters of the “Help Haiti” initiative don’t realize is that what may help the Haitian people in the short term may in fact do nothing to pull Haiti out of its current technologically stagnant and politically putrescent state.
It has been less than two weeks since President Obama promised a preliminary $100 million in aid, and already that estimate has been more than tripled, totaling more than $317 million at the last count conducted by the Associated Press . Needless to say, we’re sending a lot of immediate aid.
The question at hand is simply, why?
Suffering exists everywhere on earth. It is naive to suggest that we could even begin to stop the misery that millions across the globe endure on a daily basis.
Indeed, we are a nation afflicted with attention-deficit disorder, as well as a severe prioritization problem. When disaster strikes Haiti, we immerse ourselves in an immediate aid effort that, though well intentioned, will have little to no lasting impact upon the county’s future.
Unless President Obama intends on making a long-term military commitment to the region, like declaring Haiti a U.S. protectorate, governmental monetary emphasis should be put on rebuilding the government, not just throwing aid packages to the populace and high-tailing it back across the Atlantic.
In terms of private aid, the “trend” of donating that has taken over prime time television, as well as our school hallways, does even less.
While I extol the efforts of our community organizers and school administration for trying to bring together the school and the community in the spirit of good will, the money that we give privately suffers even more encumbrances than governmental aid.
Private aid organizations don’t have the resources (or have to pay more) to provide protection for their aid against looters and corrupt officials, as well as an efficient means of dispensing that aid.
We need to stop reacting to Haiti’s problems and adopt a proactive approach towards economic stabilization. But how is this accomplished? How is it possible to “seed” an economy for economic success? The answer lies in business, American business.
For years, Haiti has been experiencing a “brain drain;” thousands of skilled and educated Haitians have fled the nation and have requested asylum in the United States, asylum which we have granted.
This and other factors have resulted in Haiti’s perpetual abject poverty, driving the country’s annual budget down to approximately 1/3 the size of Cook County’s.
The initiation of incentives for private development would begin to reverse the “brain drain,” offering tax credits to American businesses that invest in Haiti. These investments would create a framework for the infrastructural stability that Haiti has not seen since the 1920s (when we occupied them).
The real solution lies in moving away from the government-to-government aid that has become custom, to industrial tax credits, allowing for the widespread dispersal of more capital, without increasing taxpayer costs.
The inefficiencies of government-to government aid, like mismanagement, corruption would be drastically cut back, and through tax credits, infrastructure, and institutions vital to sustained economic development could exist, and most importantly, perpetuate.
If American companies are granted tax breaks and subsidies to operate and/or invest in Haiti, drawing off the native labor pool and providing incentives for the “lost generation” of Haitian innovators to return, perhaps working for American businesses, the Haitian economy will grow and flourish, while still retaining a dependence on U.S. businesses- a win-win situation for the United States and the People of Haiti.
The most that we can do for Haiti is to not fuel the delusion that the $5 that we drop into a can at school makes any real difference to the people of Haiti in the long run, at least under our current system of aid dispersal.
If you truly want to make a difference in the lives of the Haitian people of today and tomorrow, invest in U.S. companies with ties to Haiti, and continue to strive for policy involves businesses in the aid process, businesses that draw from the Haitian workforce and stimulate the Haitian economy as well as our own.
Gordon Kirchner • Feb 10, 2010 at 6:30 pm
@Nick
The thing is, that it shouldn’t be our responsibility to help the Haitians out of their dilemma, it is their’s and rightly so. If they succeed, then their ability to succeed is passed down to the next generation, hopefully. If they fall, then their weak genetics are simply removed. A cruel, yet essential sacrifice for the continued survival of the human race.
You state that it is our duty as human beings. This is based off of a rather naive assumption that all humans are well intentioned and good natured. We all know enough history to realize that this is far from the truth. Human beings, are in fact, wretched creatures, which is of course why capitalism works so well, aand communism works hardly at all.
The point is, that even if humans were genually good, it still makes more sense to solve our own problems first. Let he who’s country is without fault cast the first relief check.
Helena Daisy • Feb 8, 2010 at 6:01 pm
The cost of *not helping* is simply too high. Think of how many Haitians are dead.
Now, think of how high the death toll would be without our aid. It’s truly horrific.
Those innocent people don’t deserve to die just because their government and economy are weak.
That being said, I do agree that we need to “teach them how to fish for themselves” – once they are stable.
Nick Stanojevic • Feb 6, 2010 at 11:31 pm
Gordon, how in the world is Haiti supposed to get themselves out of this with no help from America or other countries? Helping Haiti does not show we are “guardians of the world,” if it shows anything it shows that we are human beings.
Instead of just saying “we have our own problems,” state a solution or something. I mean if I go to a TED gathering and repeat to them The Theory of Relativity, I am not showing them I know anything, I am proving I can read. Your argument there runs into a huge contradiction. Obviously their are a lot of things we can do with $300 million, but we can’t keep any sort of positive reputation if we invade Eastern countries and allow a country in our own backyard to suffer and collapse in front of our own eyes. Look at Bush’s reaction to Katrina, he did nothing for a while and he lost all credibility as a caring President (all though the torture thing didn’t help much).
As for the whole basis of this debate, I don’t really understand how NOW people are complaining about how we never invested in the Haitian economy, yet when we offshore jobs or over-invest in foreign markets like GM, we cry (and rightfully so).
P.S. I think learning about the 2nd industrial revolution in history class has really taken a toll on juniors. You see more and more praise for social darwinism since everyone learned the Carneige’s and Rockefeller’s believed in it.
Helena Daisy • Feb 5, 2010 at 7:37 am
Andy, the alternative is NOT giving Haiti aid – and we just can’t do that. Not as Americans, not as (good) people, and personally not as a Christian.
Gordon Kirchner • Feb 3, 2010 at 4:28 pm
The question really is, WHY!? WHY are we devoting money to a country that A. isn’t going to help it, and B. isn’t going to help US either when we SHOULD be focusing on improving our far from perfect country. ESPECIALLY in a time of economic instability that our country faces currently, it really IS time to step back from our self-appointed position as “Guardians of the World” especially when we don’t protect our own people. What about unemployment rates? What about the poverty line? What about corruption, especially in our own state. Screw Haiti. They got themselves into a position where a disaster like this would cause irreparable damage to their country, and they will either get themselves out of it or let Darwinism put them in their proper place.
Mrs.Walsh • Feb 3, 2010 at 5:54 am
Andy,
I’ve heard the same statistic regarding aid from the U.S. to Haiti. When you consider the population of Haiti relative to the amount of aid that’s been given,you start to wonder, “What happened to all that money?” Haiti was the first slave colony to overthrow their oppressors. But since then, there’s been widespread corruption, instability, human trafficking, child labor and a host of other ills. Other Caribbean and Central American nations have been similiarly imperiled by natural disasters and political instability. However, as tourism, industry, and capital flowed into those nations, opportunities have flourished, and the ‘brain drain’has diminished. The Republic of Ireland has one of the fastest growing economies in the European Union. What made the difference? Favorable tax incentives encouraging companies like Bausch & Lomb, Motorola, Merrill Lynch, Braun, etc. moving their operations there. So, Andy, for once, I agree with you;)